好文档 - 专业文书写作范文服务资料分享网站

Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparosc

天下 分享 时间: 加入收藏 我要投稿 点赞

Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparoscopic

ureterolithotomy

Qiao Peng;Zhang Junhui;Wang Jianwen;Tian Xiquan;Niu Yinong;Xing Nianzeng

【期刊名称】《中华医学杂志(英文版)》 【年(卷),期】2014(127)005

【摘要】Background Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery through the retroperitoneal approach has been seldom reported.We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of LESS and conventional laparoscopic surgery via the retroperitoneal approach in the management of large,impacted ureteral calculi.Methods Between November 2011 and July 2013,retroperitoneal LESS ureterolithotomy was performed in 12 patients using a homemade single-port device comprising a surgical glove and several strips of tape.Another 16 patients underwent conventional compared

retroperitoneal the

operative

laparoscopic

ureterolithotomy.We

surgical

time,complications,and

outcomes,retrospectively.Results All patients were completed without conversion to conventional laparoscopic or open surgery.The operative time of the LESS group and of the conventional laparoscopic group were (125.3±12.8) minutes and (116.9±14.4)minutes,respectively (P=0.119).The intraoperative blood loss was (42.9±8.9) and (43.4±14.7) ml,respectively (P=0.914).Postoperative radiologic evaluation revealed

Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy versus conventional laparosc

Retroperitoneallaparoendoscopicsingle-siteureterolithotomyversusconventionallaparoscopicureterolithotomyQiaoPeng;ZhangJunhui;WangJianwen;TianXiquan;NiuYinong;Xing
推荐度:
点击下载文档文档为doc格式
9tpxx6iluq0zdc523xwm17c19373ml00glz
领取福利

微信扫码领取福利

微信扫码分享