firstlly,the success of child would not seperated from round education.as the hebert spenser's famouse saying:education is has for it abject the information of charactors.its reported by scientists that the disble man also can performs as well as the nomal people if they are nurtured and educated.the parents as the first teacher and teachers should give proper instruction and correct guidance to their development.
secondlly,indiviial great efforts is indispensable.the many politican and statemans gain success though the great efforts when they were young.there is also countexample.the most successful people may not be the most cleverest people.according to the studies conducted among the group who was the same class before 10 years,those whose average point is in the middle 50 % ,all became the richers and managers.while few of the young people who is upper 10 % became the bosses or excutives.studies show people who do not word hard only depend on their intelligence will be far from the sucess.
therefore,the kid is the seed,the nurture is the fertile soil in which the seed can grow well.among all ingredients for children's development,round education is very important,moreover,individial offort is also indispensable! 范文11
The contentious issue in the domain of sociology in the past mainly concentrated on postnatal nurture and congenital element still has been steeped in controversy nowadays. The key point of it is, which factor has top priority in personal grow th and progress. On the strength of compelling and convincing research and eviden ce, I prefer the former. This essay will outline the following reasons.
In the first place, environment and parents enlightenment play utmost and crucial roles in children?s personalities and further development. When they are young, they often unconsciously imitate parents? behaviors. As prevailing Chinese slan g says, “Better unborn than unbred”, which connotes that parents should strengt hen the supervision over and education of kids. After accepting education in scho ol, their identities and ideas are deeply affected by diverse instruction system and even distinguishing courses. For instance, students of science are apt at log ical thinking, while students of arts are inclined to thinking in image. Granted that it happens to identical twins, their behaviors are not genetic because life has presented them with different opportunities.
In the second place, one with innate intellect uncertainly becomes a genius insom uch as his success owes much to his capabilities and arduous efforts. Take an ins tance of Charlotte Bronte?s brother who was quite bright during his childhood. O nly did he depend on his superior intellect, so that neglected his study. Finally he became an idle person, while his sister became a famous author as a result of hard study. Even Albert Einstein said, “A genius is that kind of person with 99 percent diligence plus 1 percent intelligence.” Apparently, his success is not so much by talent as by strenuous work.
In conclusion, no one can choose his nature, but one can be successful after stri ving for himself and being well educated. Moreover, no one can be triumphant only relying on his genes. Namely, nurture passes nature. 范文12
V111 Children - Nature or Nurture?
Which one has deeper influence on molding children?s personalities and their development nature or nurture?
In certain respects, children are the same all over the world. But when they grow up, they become quite different. What has caused such considerable changes? I believe nurture plays the crucial role in personality and development of a child. In another word, the circumstances surrounding the child are more important to form its character.
As an old saying remarked, ?No man is born wise or learned?. Had nobody taught him, a man would even not be able to count from 1 to 10, no matter how talented he were. In fact, a nascent infant to who has scarcely given birth, in certain aspects, is just the same as a kitten being no aware of so-called character. Its nature is to cry for food when it feels hungry, or cry for release when it feels uncomfortable. That is that. The true story of ?wolf-child? can be the best evidence.
On the other hand, the parents, teachers, as well as other people around a child, are the main builders who develop its personality. Learning from the circumstances, the child forms its character and concepts of the world. People always say ?the best horse needs breeding, and the aptest child needs teaching.? Without correct guidance, a clear conscience can even go bad. For instance, a father is a deep drug addict, and in most cases, his son starts this dangerous experience very early, by reason of smoky air he has breathed since his childhood. Such situation is not rare. On the contrary, we often hear similar news from media.
As you can tell from my analysis, among all factors affecting the growth of children, nurture is the crucial one, which is much more important than the nature or any other else. 范文13
Nature or nurture, which one has major influence on our personality and development? This issue has been widely debated in our country nowadays. As far as I am concerned, I am inclined to support the standpoint that nurture plays a more crucial role in youngster?s development.
To begin with, scientific research has already proved that the intelligence quotient(IQ) we were born with is not differ from each other too much. We have to admit that the so-called whiz-kids could be found are actually seldom. If we want to lead to any success, we need to rely on postnatal education and self-struggle which are the decisive factors. For example, Edison was regarded as a fool in his primary school. However, he got uneaqualed achievement by his own efforts.
In the second place, children?s limited natural gift will disappear soon if his/her nurture can not support it sufficient. Only can we say that the advantageous intelligence is a helpful condition to achievement, but the advantages will not last for long. There is Chinese fable: a boy called zy had some talents in poetry, so his father continuous take him to attend feast to boast his gift instead of bringing him to school, several years latter, zy have not any intelligence in composing poems any more. Therefore, we can find how important does the parental education and studying environment are! Finally, the concept for success given by Einstein also indicates the essential effect of education and hardworking. He said: success is equal to 99% of diligence plus only 1% of genius. From his notion, we can easily find that the diligence is the indispensable element for people?s accomplishments. From all mentioned above, we can safely come to a conclusion that only education and industry can mould people to be excellent and outstanding, merely depend on
So-called nature gifts are absolutely deficiency. 111(别人写的）
There is a dispute over what plays a chief role in one?s personality and development. Some maintain that it is concluded by the characteristic people born with, whereas others are confident that it defers to the experiences people have had in the life. For my part, I tend to share the latter point of view, and I would like to give two major reasons in the following.
On one hand, wealth and material status have an import effect on people?s personality. According to Maslow?s Theory, basic needs is human being?s primary requirement. Without solving the basic demand for food and clothes, people?s character is vulnerable to be ruined and can hardly develop in other spheres. For example, there were twins born in a poor countryside. One of them was adopted by a rich relative and lived in a???? metropolis, but the other stayed in village. Thirty years later, the urban son grew up into a prosperous professional, while the rural one was uneducated and made a hard life. It is different material condition that contributes to this contrast.
On the other hand, education, particularly the education from one?s childhood to adolescence, has a final say on his development. Children are too young to distinguish good from bad. They ought to be taken under the guidance of parents and teachers. Sensible ideas and decent behaviors lead them to become moral persons. Something evil, otherwise, such as violent films and drugs, make them stray from the right way. Herewith, people with excellent development are usually well educated.
To sum up, diverse contributing factors can be identified, nevertheless, I still insist that acquired experiences have much more influence on people?s personality and development. What we must do is making sure that the positive ones are encouraged and the negative ones are eliminated as far as possible.
Version 00113
some people think that university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to give practical training benefit to society. do you agree or disagree. use your own experience and knowledge to support your idea. 范文1
Most universities and colleges spend a rather long period in fundamental theories and elementary courses. But students regard these kinds of knowledge useless, and pay less attention to them. They suggest school pay more time for practical training instead of providing theoretical lessons. In my opinion, however, theoretical knowledge is necessary. And one will definitely benefit from it.
First, fundamental theories, such as math and physics, are the basis of other knowledge. To a student who majors in automatic control, the course of control system is the most practical and useful in the future. But if he isn?t good at math and circuit, he will hardly be able to understand the principles and methods of how to control a subject or process. It is just like
constructing a building. How can you imagine a spectacular high-rise without a firm groundsill? That is, theories and practices are interrelated. We can ignore neither of them.
Second, theoretical basic knowledge provides not only the knowledge itself, but also a way that how to learn and research. University is a place for scientific research and invention. So it is necessary for students to have the skill of doing research. Seeing from another angle, science and techniques are exploding so quickly that present skills will soon be out of date. If one learnt nothing except practical skills, he would also fall behind the society. But if one could master the method of research, he would be able to refresh himself continuously with advanced technology.
From all the commentaries above, we can learn the important role of theoretical knowledge. Although pragmatism is very popular today, we should pay enough attention to the basis and principles. 范文2
Nowhere in the world has the issue of student been so much debated as in our society. In this competitive society, ability of work and employment experience have become very important features of ordinary students? futur e; therefore, many people think that university should teach students the rea l knowledge that comes from practice and direct experience. The above point is certainly wrong; this essay will outline three reasons.
The main reason is that students? study will be delayed and disadvantaged. The academic knowledge of students will be hard to make greater progress in order to practical training and employment experience. In this special period of life, students have the best memory and intellect. If they do not work hard at study, they will lose it that could be balanced by neither good employment experience nor information of outside classroom. If students choose to carefully study academic knowledge in the university, they would gain a better future.
Another reason is that current knowledge of students is not enough capable to face practical training?s requirements. If students are not taught professional theoretical knowledge, they just depend on the basal academic knowledge that they studied in the high school. In fact, they are really difficult to progress real practical training and gain abundant employment experience.
Last but not the least reason is the professional theoretical knowledge that it is necessary to work of future. For instance, when I graduated from university, I did not have any employment experience. But, I was hired a famous network company. I could gain this work chance, only, because of my professional theoretical knowledge.
In conclusion, the students ought to only study theoretical knowledge in the university. It is unnecessary to let university that provides plenty of practical training 范文3
Which kind of courses should universities provide: theoretical knowledge or practical training? Some people prefer the later one and assert that the practical training can benefit our society. Personally, I strongly disagree with their point of view for three reasons.
Among countless factors which influence my propensity, there is a most conspicuous one: practical experience should be accumulated in society, not in universities. I can think of no better illustration than the saying: “society is another kind of university” (Mao Zedong). Literarily, in society people can study practical knowledge as well as studying theoretical knowledge in universities. Besides, campus is full of academic atmosphere, and there is totally different from the circumstance in society. Thus, it is difficult for students to accumulate the real practical experience in campus. The second aspect relates to the importance of theoretical knowledge. Apparently, it would seem that some academic subjects, such as mathematics or sociology, cannot benefit companies or society directly. In fact, however, they are the basis of practical subjects, such as management or finance. For example, it is almost impossible to talk of economics without mentioning the fundamental roles played by statistics and mathematics.
Furthermore, universities are where theoretical knowledge is handed down from generation to generation. As we know, form Oxford University to Yale University, from Beijing University to MIT, universities congregate a lot of preeminent scholars and professors whose main jobs are the academic research. They are responsible to impart the academic knowledge to the young generation in case of they are faded from our memory.
In summary, from what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that the theoretical courses are not as obsolete, profitless and unimportant as some people believed. And our universities should be responsible to provide the theoretical knowledge 范文4
along with the shinking job market,the young school leavers found its more and more hard to follow the ideal job,therefore ,they place the blame on the universities today,saying that courses offered by universities cant provide them the enough practical training which ensure them a decent job , a chanllenging and promotion position.i dont think that view can hold water.they dont really understand the function of universities in our society. its impossible that people experience all important events,only by practical training offered by universities.as the speed of which skills is getting obsolete,the new techolology and science is getting unpredictable.the practical training is far from the enough.the theoritical knowlege provide us unlimi
ted additional experience.we not only can trace back the wisdom of anticedents.we also can keep up with the development of society.sure,its the second- hand experience.few of us can live over 100years,but all of us can live many lives by learning anticedents's second- hand experience. moreover,the university is not teach us how to earn our bread,but make us every monthful sweeter.thats is to say,they can not guarantee our future jobs.but they can help me to add energy,to rich inspire,to increase knowledge.which set us apart from the schools which only vocational trainings.without a solid theoritical knowledge,the latter cant elicit our creativity.
therefore,we should not measure the university only by how many their grauduates get established in society.结尾忘了，由于作文给了别人，以上所有作文都是回忆的，这个结尾大家自己补充。 范文5
Most universities and colleges spend a rather long period in fundamental theories and elementary courses. But students regard these kinds of knowledge useless, and pay less attention to them. Thus, some people think that university should not provide theoretical knowledge, but to give practical training benefit to society. As for me, I think this view is reasonable in some aspects.
First of all, the theoretical knowledge just handles problem is an abstract concept. It must combine with real job, can just give play to its efficiency. The theoretical knowledge losing contact with reality is nonsensical. For instance, as everyone knows, with the development of society, Work position more and more need experienced talent, that is to say, they need those people who can combine theoretical knowledge with practice. So, more offering practice training to university students can help them to adapt to the society better.
Secondly, the theoretical knowledge root in practice. Any theory knowledge is obtained from the work of practicing. The universities provide practical training to students, make them understand the theoretical knowledge deeply. Just because of this, more and more universities stipulate that students should participate in social work at least one year in the four years, in order to get practical training.
However, the theoretical knowledge is the quintessence of practice, and it is the important course that we can't ignore too. So, theoretical knowledge and practice have the equal status in our study.
In a word, theory knowledge and practical training are all our required courses. We must study theory knowledge, and then apply it to practice. Just like what a famous sayings said: thoughts can give off brilliant light only when put into actions.
version114
People have different expectation for jobs. Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company, and some people rather than change the job frequently. advantage and disadvantage? 赖劲松老师的范文1
Some people prefer to stay in the same job for the same company, but others prefer to change jobs frequently. You should use specific reasons to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both sides.
people rarely have an absolute consensus on the controversial issue whether a man should intend to go in for a life-time career. These day, very few people prefer to always taking a position.
in some senses, a life-time career has its merits. First, if you stick at taking a post, all angles of the job will have appeared; after some time, you will definitely have a good command of it. Consequently you may become a veteran of the field and earn respect or prestige from others. Second, you can establish an extensive social connections relating to the field, helping you tear down most of the barriers standing in the way of your working endeavor. Finally, mistakes of the routine tasks would be minimized because you have learned the lessons.
however, as the modern society develops, experiencing different jobs has its advantages. Initially, we look at the issue of bribery. Many high-level staff are inclined to accept bribes via power in hand. However, if he knows that someone else will soon take his place, such acts can be avoided. We then look at work motivation. If one works for the same company for a long time without promotion, he may get sick and tired of doing the same dail
雅思写作范文100篇
