后腹腔镜下与开放肾癌根治术临床疗效的回顾性比较
闫克峰;孙振业;王远;冯超杰;杨铁军;何朝宏
【期刊名称】《中国实用医刊》 【年(卷),期】2016(043)003
【摘要】目的：回顾性比较后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术与开放肾癌根治术治疗肾癌的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2012年8月至2015年3月收治的肾癌患者144例的临床资料，其中后腹腔镜手术68例（A 组），传统的开放手术76例（B 组）。对两组的临床疗效进行对比研究。结果两组发病年龄、体质量指数（BMI）、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置的比较差异未见统计学意义（P ＞0.05）；A 组手术时间[（130.15±29.61）min]较 B 组手术时间[（116.88±26.18）min]长，二者比较差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。A 组术中估计出血量为（154.12±80.47）ml，B 组估计出血量为（213.42±138.86）ml，二者比较差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。A 组术后肠功能恢复时间、术后拔除腹膜后引流管时间、术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间均明显优于 B 组，差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。A 组并发症显著少于 B 组。结论后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术与开放式肾癌根治术相比，前者具有术中出血少、创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短等优点。所以后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术微创而有效。%Objective To compare the clinical effects of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and open approach to radical nephrectomy on renal cell carcinoma(RCC). Methods From August 2012 to March 2015,the clinical data of 144 patients with RCC underwent radical nephrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty-eight patients in group A underwent
retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy,and 76 patients in group B underwent open radical nephrectomy for re-nal cell carcinoma. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in age,BMI,tumor size or tumor location between the two groups(P > 0. 05). The operation time of group A and group B was (130. 15 ± 29. 61)min and(116. 88 ± 26. 18)min,there was significant difference(P < 0. 05). The intraoperative esti-mated blood loss in group A was(154. 12 ± 80. 47)ml,and(213. 42 ± 138. 86)ml in group B,there was significant differ-ence(P < 0. 05). The intestinal function recovery time,the duration of retroperitoneal tube drainage,the ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in group A than those in group B(P < 0. 05). The complications in group A were less than those in group
B.
Conclusions
Compared
with
open
radical
nephrectomy,retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has the advantages of shorter operation period,lower blood loss,shorter hospital stay and earlier resumption of routine activities. So retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal carcinoma is a minimally invasive and effective procedure. 【总页数】3页(69-71)
【关键词】后腹腔镜;开放手术;微创;肾癌根治术 【作者】闫克峰;孙振业;王远;冯超杰;杨铁军;何朝宏
【作者单位】450008 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科;450008 郑州大学附属
肿瘤医院泌尿外科;450008 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科;450008 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科;450008 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科;450008 郑州大学附属肿瘤医院泌尿外科 【正文语种】中文 【中图分类】 【文献来源】
https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_chinese-journal-practical-medicine_thesis/0201255121545.html 【相关文献】
1.后腹腔镜下与开放根治性肾切除术治疗肾癌的疗效比较 [J], 丁锡奇; 李光 2.后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术与开放式肾癌根治术的疗效比较 [J], 郑斌
3.后腹腔镜与开放肾癌根治性手术的回顾性比较 [J], 王晓庆; 汪岩; 卢绩; 陈岐辉; 侯宇川; 姜凤鸣; 王春喜
4.后腹腔镜下肾癌根治术和开放性肾癌根治术的临床效果及对患者神经内分泌功能的影响 [J], 徐洋涛; 潘岩; 孙志青; 许跃军; 刘晨溪; 刘勇; 田雪涛; 朱峰 5.后腹腔镜肾癌根治术与开放手术的临床疗效比较 [J], 陈祥东; 李培军; 张庆辉
以上内容为文献基本信息，获取文献全文请下载
后腹腔镜下与开放肾癌根治术临床疗效的回顾性比较
