好文档 - 专业文书写作范文服务资料分享网站

体外冲击波碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石疗效比较

天下 分享 时间: 加入收藏 我要投稿 点赞

体外冲击波碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石

疗效比较

苏斌;黄少芹;万跃平;王重南

【期刊名称】《新乡医学院学报》 【年(卷),期】2012(029)006

【摘要】Objective To compared the clinical effect of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy(ESWL) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(mPCNL) for kidney lower calycal calculi. Methods Among Seventy-five patients with kidney lower calycal calculi,fifty-four patients in ESWL group were treated with ESWL,twenty-one patients in mPCNL group were treated with mPCNL, the stone clearance and complication were compared between two groups. Results The stone clearance of ESWL group and mPCNL group was 31.5% and 76.2% respectively, the stone clearance of mPCNL group was significantly higher than that of ESWL group( P <0.05 ). In ESWL group, the complications included forty-eight cases of varying degrees of gross hematuria,six cases of fever,two cases of perirenal hematoma;in mPCNL group,the complications included one case of delayed hemorrhage after operation and three cases of urinary tract infection. Conclusion For the patients with kidney lower calycal calculi with stone diameter of 1-2 cm,the stone clearance of mPCNL is higher than that of ESWL,and the complication is few.%目的 比较体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与微创经皮肾镜取

体外冲击波碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石疗效比较

体外冲击波碎石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石疗效比较苏斌;黄少芹;万跃平;王重南【期刊名称】《新乡医学院学报》【年(卷),期】2012(029)006【摘要】ObjectiveTocomparedtheclinicaleffectofextracorporealshock-wavelitho
推荐度:
点击下载文档文档为doc格式
1993y9dw2h371qz5d0ci05ej21u0rq00k2j
领取福利

微信扫码领取福利

微信扫码分享