双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈
骨折疗效比较
袁堂波;黄立新;蒋建农;孙俊英;徐耀增;董天华
【期刊名称】《实用骨科杂志》 【年(卷),期】2013(019)006
【摘要】目的 比较双极人工股骨头置换术(bipolar femoral head replacement,BFHR)与全髋关节置换术(total hip replacement,THR)治疗老年人股骨颈骨折的疗效.方法 对2004年3月至2010年2月我院收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者进行随访研究,共获得74例有完整随访资料的病例.根据手术方法不同分为BFHR组和THR组,BFHR组42例,男7例,女35例,平均年龄77.3岁.THR组32例,男9例,女23例,平均年龄74.8岁.比较两组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、术中输血量、术后引流量、住院费用、住院时间及术后髋关节功能恢复程度.结果 两组患者经过1～6.5年(平均3.2年)随访,BFHR组和THR组在住院时间、术后引流量及术后1年髋关节功能方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；而在手术时间、术中输血量、术中失血量、住院费用、术后3年及5年髋关节功能方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 老年股骨颈骨折行THR后关节功能恢复较好,远期并发症较低,是老年人股骨颈骨折的首选治疗方法；BFHR具有手术时间短、创伤小、出血少及住院费用低等优点,适合于少数身体状况差、伤前活动量小、伴有较多基础病、或受伤前伤肢已有功能障碍的高龄患者.%Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who were treated by BFHR and THR.Methods We randomized 74 patients with femoral neck fracture to
surgical treatment with either BFHR or THR and followed them post operatively from March 2004 to February 2010.There were 42 cases in the BFHR group and 32 in the THR group.We compared the two groups from operative time,intra-operative blood transfusion,intra-operative blood loses,postoperative drainage,hospitalization period,cost of hospitalization and postoperative recovery of hip function.Results Two groups of patients are interviewed randomly from 1 year to 6.5 years,3.2 years on average.There was no significant difference between BFHR group with THR group in hospitalization period,postoperative drainage and 1 year postoperative recovery of hip function (P＞ 0.05).However,operative time,intra-operative blood loses,intra-operative blood transfusion,3 years and 5 years postoperative recovery of hip function between the two groups showed significant difference (P＜0.05).Conclusion Total hip replacement has higher recovery rate of hip function,less long-term postoperative complications,and is the preferred method of artificial hip replacement.Bipolar femoral head replacement is a more suitable method for elderly patients who are in worse health conditions,with basic diseases,with smaller exercise-load,or with hip dysfunction before injury,because it has advantages in little trauma,less intra-operative blood loses,less operative time,less cost of hospitalization etc. 【总页数】4页(485-488)
【关键词】老年;股骨颈骨折;双极人工股骨头置换术;全髋关节置换术 【作者】袁堂波;黄立新;蒋建农;孙俊英;徐耀增;董天华
【作者单位】江苏大学附属宜兴医院骨科,江苏宜兴 214200;苏州大学附属第一医院骨科,江苏苏州 215006;江苏大学附属宜兴医院骨科,江苏宜兴 214200;苏州大学附属第一医院骨科,江苏苏州 215006;苏州大学附属第一医院骨科,江苏苏州 215006;苏州大学附属第一医院骨科,江苏苏州 215006 【正文语种】中文 【中图分类】R683.42 【文献来源】
https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_journal-practical-orthopaedics_thesis/0201233698891.html 【相关文献】
1.双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较 [J], 刘金宝
2.双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较 [J], 肖冬生
3.全髋关节置换术与双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年患者股骨颈骨折的疗效比较 [J], 宋羡; 张强; 李维汉; 张跃云
4.人工双极股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年新鲜移位股骨颈骨折的疗效比较 [J], 杨明敏; 孙扬; 曹力
5.全髋关节置换术和双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的比较研究 [J], 杨海梁; 赵汝平; 刘晓野
双极人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较
